home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180p036.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  86KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane
OCR: 24 The Process Clauae Does Not Require Notice And An Opportunity For Hearing Prior To Seizure Property That Satisfies Fourth Amend- ment Siandards The court 1 appeals did not suggest that the sei- zure of the respondent property this case violated the Fourth Amendment. In fact. did not even mention that Amendment. Instead, invoking moderm decisions of this Court in civil cases outside the con- fext of law enforcement and forfeiture, the court appeals relicd on the Due Process Clause in holding that the seizure in this case was unconstitutional be- cause Good EBA not given notice and an oppurtunity for hear ring hefore the seizure. Pet. App. 13a-16a (discussing Mathews Eldr ridge ans Tuentes Shevin} Contrary the court of appeals' view however the Due Process Clause imposes no proce dural re ...